Digital photo display: requirements
300 wordsI was trying to read this morning, but as it happened my laptop was angled such that it was clear view, and the Picasa screensaver came on. I couldn’t stop looking at it: it has some pretty pictures and some good memories on it.
This got me to thinking: what would persuade me to cave in and buy one of those digital photo displays? They’re increasingly cheap, but I don’t think they’re quite right yet. What would it take to make something I’d be pleased to hang on the wall at home?
So here’s what I want:
- at least 15 inches diagonal
- 4:3 aspect ratio - since that’s what comes out of most cameras
- look as good as or better than a colour laptop display (I specified this in terms of resolution and colour depth, but replaced it with this more subjective statement)
- viewable from as many angles as a print
- e-ink, because:
- it should reflect light like a print, not transmit light like a screen
- it should use little-to-no power when displaying a still picture
- battery operated - one set of batteries should last at least 6 months
- modular enough to mount in the frame of your choice - I don’t mind too much if I have to break a warranty and hack it apart, but I do want that to be possible. It’s even better it it’s designed to be used with arbitrary frames.
- reads from a standard memory card (WiFi would be nice, but it’s not a deal-breaker for me)
This doesn’t seem too much to ask. I’d pay about £80 for something that met all those requirements: more than you’d pay for a LCD photo frame today. E-ink is on the cusp of becoming mainstream. I think full colour e-ink will be expensive for a short while, and then as production ramps up, drop in price dramatically. Fingers crossed!