Sunday, February 15th, 2009

Digital photo display: requirements

300 words

I was trying to read this morning, but as it happened my laptop was angled such that it was clear view, and the Picasa screensaver came on. I couldn’t stop looking at it: it has some pretty pictures and some good memories on it.

This got me to thinking: what would persuade me to cave in and buy one of those digital photo displays? They’re increasingly cheap, but I don’t think they’re quite right yet. What would it take to make something I’d be pleased to hang on the wall at home?

So here’s what I want:

  • at least 15 inches diagonal
  • 4:3 aspect ratio - since that’s what comes out of most cameras
  • look as good as or better than a colour laptop display (I specified this in terms of resolution and colour depth, but replaced it with this more subjective statement)
  • viewable from as many angles as a print
  • e-ink, because:
    • it should reflect light like a print, not transmit light like a screen
    • it should use little-to-no power when displaying a still picture
  • battery operated - one set of batteries should last at least 6 months
  • modular enough to mount in the frame of your choice - I don’t mind too much if I have to break a warranty and hack it apart, but I do want that to be possible. It’s even better it it’s designed to be used with arbitrary frames.
  • reads from a standard memory card (WiFi would be nice, but it’s not a deal-breaker for me)

This doesn’t seem too much to ask. I’d pay about £80 for something that met all those requirements: more than you’d pay for a LCD photo frame today. E-ink is on the cusp of becoming mainstream. I think full colour e-ink will be expensive for a short while, and then as production ramps up, drop in price dramatically. Fingers crossed!

Leave a Reply



Spam Karma 2 has sent 82787 comments to hell and 204 comments to purgatory. The total spam karma of this blog is -25724. What's your karma?